Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mat Hadfield's avatar

Well written and I agree on many fronts, Grant's work was certainly important and transformative to modern streams of magic that have run downstream from the Golden Dawn and Thelema. Having read and re-read his Typhonian Trilogy's twice now, I can say I have a rather nuanced opinion of his contributions. Personally I think he caused a lot of damage which has survived into the modern day, most especially in the dark-fluff streams of the LHP. Grant's syncretism was way too open and it lead in many instances to confusing word and number soup. His gematria often doesn't add up, and the leaps he makes are often fantastical and bewildering. You mention Nightside of Eden, as everyone who comments on Grant always does, probably being his most popular work, few ever tackle Outside the Circles of Time or Outer Gateways. Equally as important, although equally as wild in tone and assertions. My primary issue with Nightside is that Grant deliberately and wilfully ignores fully half of Liber 231, which was the primary inspiration for the book. He only presents half of the information and fails to explain the context to his readers. As a result, I find that all of his output suffers the same sly cherry picking of facts and ideas to weave a narrative which, ultimately, only existed in his own imagination, only to present these ideas as if they have any meaning or relevance, mundane or magical, to his readers.

On the flip side, his support for Spare and in propagating his art and writing absolutely contributed to the development of Chaos Magic (which unfortunately largely missed the point Spare was trying to make). Whatever your opinion of CM may be, we can't avoid that it was a vitalising and transformative phase of modern occulture which was desperately needed at the time. I would also add that Grant's conceptualisation of Spirits as independent intelligences was on point, and for that I am grateful, even if a lot of his other writings are more psychological in nature.

You write that Grant's work opened up the realm of Dreams to magic, despite dream magic being very well accounted for in the historical record, not only in the medieval grimoires, but as far back as the Greek Magical Papyri (and presumably much earlier). He may have popularised it, but blending hammer horror, aliens and Lovecraft into something doesn't really give it much more weight in my opinion. It's ultimately a spooky gloss over a subject that very few people actually understood during Grant's time. Creative and powerful to Grant himself, no doubt, yes. But what we should focus on is the technique of what he was doing, not the output he created, and then only if we are interested in experiencing a form of mysticism which functions on a form of psychological flooding whereby all things become meaningful and a direct communication with the divine.

Thank you for the well considered and thoughtful article.

The Web of Wyrd's avatar

His work with the Mauve Zone changed my life fundamentally.

17 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?